Category: Interpersonal Insight

  • Secure in Love, Anxious About Losing It: Anxious Attachment

    The last time I wrote about the book Attached, I mentioned thinking that I had an anxious attachment style. What I did not explain was that I eventually landed somewhere slightly different: securely attached, but with anxious tendencies.

    Before reading the book, if you had asked me what anxious attachment looked like, I would have pictured a jealous person.

    Someone who checks her husband’s phone. Someone who feels threatened by other women. Someone who is constantly searching for evidence that she is about to be replaced.

    So imagine my surprise when I recognized parts of myself in the description.

    Because I am not jealous.

    When Robert and I were engaged, my mom and stepdad came to visit us at the house we had recently purchased. We were cooking dinner and visiting when Robert’s phone rang.

    There was a woman on the other end.

    She was stranded at the Russellville exit after dark and asked if Robert could come help her. She knew he lived nearby. I knew her from the short time I attended Robert’s high school, and I remembered thinking she was beautiful.

    Robert wanted to go help her, and I supported that.

    As he was leaving, I remember my mom protectively asking, “Are you sending him by himself?”

    “Yes,” I said.

    In my head, I was thinking, Why would I go? My family is visiting, and I can’t do anything to help her.

    My mom apparently felt that I was not being protective enough of my future marriage, so she sent my stepdad with him.

    Seems pretty secure of me, right?

    About a month later, we were close to getting married. I would soon be moving into our house, so I came to Russellville to decorate while Robert cleaned the gutters.

    I remember him standing on a ladder.

    And I remember thinking, I hope he doesn’t fall and die.

    I told him I could not bear to watch him up there.

    At the time, I knew nothing about attachment styles, but I carried that memory with me for the next sixteen years of our marriage.

    It made me wonder whether anxious attachment can take different forms.

    I do not check Robert’s phone. He has given me his Facebook password at least twenty times, but I could not tell you what it is right now.

    I have never spent much time worrying that another woman might take him from me.

    But I can cry almost instantly when I think about saying goodbye or about everything that could happen before we are ready to.

    The other night, Robert and I were outside working on our outdoor kitchen. Heat, exhaustion, and sleep deprivation had taken their toll on me.

    I looked around at everything we had worked so hard to build together, and a thought entered my mind:

    What if tomorrow God decided it was Robert’s time to go home?

    Suddenly, all of it felt temporary.

    The house. The outdoor kitchen. The pool. The life we had spent sixteen years creating.

    Without him, I would become the woman who had it all and nothing at the same time.

    It was not a fleeting thought. It produced sadness. It created a knot in my throat and brought tears to my eyes.

    It also produced an action response.

    I went and found Robert a hat. I turned on our enormous outdoor fan. I made sure he was not getting overheated.

    And I told him I loved him.

    I know that may sound like an enormous emotional leap—from watching my husband work in the heat to imagining life without him—but it is not much different from an anxiously attached person sensing a slight shift in a relationship and imagining its complete demise.

    The difference is that I am not anxious about being chosen.

    I am anxious about losing what has already been chosen.

    I hesitate to say that without clarifying something important.

    I do not think my version of anxiety is somehow better, deeper, or more loving than someone else’s.

    On paper, jealousy may sound less loving than being afraid of death or separation, but I do not think fear becomes more noble simply because it is not about betrayal.

    Anxious attachment is still anxious attachment when the feared rupture is death, an accident, emotional distance, abandonment, or another person.

    All of it deserves self-awareness because all of it can lead us to react to fear as though it were fact.

    My anxiety may not make me search Robert’s phone, but it can make me search a delayed phone call, a change in routine, or a quiet expression for evidence that something is wrong.

    Trusting his faithfulness does not always mean I peacefully trust life.

    My fear can also make it difficult to fully enjoy something while part of me remains aware that it will not last forever.

    Sometimes I think I try to survive the loss of things before I have actually lost them.

    One of the most interesting things I learned in Attached was that people with anxious attachment tendencies can be extremely sensitive to emotional changes.

    Because they fear rupture in a relationship, they may become highly alert to changes in mood, behavior, tone, and routine.

    Long before I read the book, I knew I was good at reading a room.

    I notice emotional shifts before anyone says a word. I watch patterns. I detect changes. I decode them.

    Detecting the shift is not usually my problem.

    The decoding is where I can get into trouble.

    The book describes research in which people with anxious attachment tendencies were often able to recognize that an emotional atmosphere had changed. But when they were asked to immediately decide what had caused the change, their interpretations were much less accurate.

    They detected the shift correctly.

    Then anxiety filled in the blanks.

    When they were told to pause before deciding what the emotional shift meant, their accuracy improved. Their instincts had noticed something real, but they needed time to separate what they observed from what they feared.

    Eventually, I began to recognize that pattern in myself.

    My boss was quieter than usual, and I wondered if there was a problem with my job performance.

    It turned out that they had received terrible news on the way to work.

    Robert seemed preoccupied, and my mind whispered that he might be pulling away.

    It turned out that he was distracted because he was acting as director while his boss was out of town.

    My instincts were not necessarily wrong when they told me something was different.

    I was wrong when I immediately assumed the difference was about me or about the security of the relationship.

    The most memorable example happened during one of Robert’s outages at the nuclear plant.

    A man from the plant had previously died on his way home after working night shift during an outage. A year or so later, I woke up at 7:00 one morning, and Robert had not made it home.

    He was normally home by 6:30.

    He was not answering his phone. He had not texted to say he would be late, and at that time, I did not have a direct number I could call inside the plant.

    The more time passed, the more frightening the silence became.

    Logically, I knew that if he had been in a serious accident, the police likely would have contacted me.

    But ambiguity is fertile ground for an anxious mind.

    Every unanswered question became another opportunity for my brain to create an answer, and every answer was worse than the one before it.

    Robert finally called at 7:45.

    The person who was supposed to relieve him had been late. Robert could not leave his position or get to a phone until someone arrived to take over.

    Nothing terrible had happened.

    But my brain had noticed a break in a familiar pattern, and it immediately prepared me for rupture.

    That is the anxious tendency I recognize in myself.

    It is not, Who is he talking to?

    It is, Why is this different?

    It is not, Is he going to choose someone else?

    It is, Is something happening that could take him away from me?

    Understanding this has not made me incapable of anxious thoughts. It has simply taught me not to treat every thought as a conclusion.

    Now, when I sense a shift, I try to separate three things:

    What did I actually observe?

    What story did my mind attach to it?

    What else could be true?

    Sometimes intuition is telling us that something has changed.

    But anxiety is often the voice insisting that we already know why.

    The pause between those two things has changed the way I respond, not only in my marriage but in nearly every relationship I have.

    I am also not speaking from a place of believing that betrayal or separation could never happen.

    I know spouses can leave. Marriages can end. People can make choices that once seemed impossible.

    I have just never felt that Robert’s hand was on the door.

    I am much more convinced that if he leaves this life before I do, it will not be by his own choosing.

    And that is where I land on my attachment style.

    Maybe I am secure in my marriage but anxious about its permanence.

    I do not believe our story would end because we stopped choosing each other.

    What makes our bond special is not that the world contains no one else with potential. We do not choose each other because there are no other attractive, interesting, or compatible people in existence.

    We choose each other because we committed to.

    No matter where temptation, difficulty, distraction, or disappointment appears, we both know where we are going to end up.

    In each other’s arms.

    Maybe I was never afraid that Robert would stop choosing me.

    Maybe I was afraid that one day, life would not let me keep him.

  • The Story I Told Myself About Robert

    When I read “Attached,” I thought it would help me understand relationship dynamics, which I find fascinating. As I shared in my previous post about my own mixture of secure attachment with anxious traits, I wasn’t expecting one book to answer questions for both Robert and me.

    For years, Robert believed he was avoidant.

    It made sense to him.

    He doesn’t enjoy conflict.

    He’s not reactive.

    He’s calm.

    He’s slow to assume the worst.

    People at work have even described him as lacking emotion.

    My family teased him about it, too.

    I used to joke that he would have made a wonderful oncologist because he could gently deliver terrible news by simply saying, “This isn’t good news.”

    Not in a cold way.

    Actually, in the warmest way possible.

    That’s always been Robert.

    Even when we were dating, he didn’t always choose to spend every free moment with me. But when he told me, he did it with so much kindness and warmth that I couldn’t quite reach the conclusion my friends reached, that we should break up.

    Then I read about avoidant attachment.

    The more I learned, the less Robert sounded avoidant.

    Avoidantly attached people often fiercely protect their independence.

    They tend to value autonomy over interdependence.

    Deep dependence can feel uncomfortable.

    That wasn’t Robert.

    Robert was the one who asked me to leave my career and stay home with our children.

    He wanted to build a life where we depended on each other.

    We share finances.

    We built a home.

    We’re raising four children.

    Our lives are deeply intertwined.

    That isn’t someone avoiding attachment.

    That’s someone deeply attached.

    The more I read, the more I realized Robert wasn’t avoidant at all.

    Actually, he’s often the most emotionally steady person in the room.

    He wasn’t avoidant.

    He was secure.

    What I found most interesting was how far from the truth both of our assumptions were.

    As we sat on the porch talking about everything I had learned, Robert told me he had always assumed he was avoidant because he had once heard a fitness podcast briefly mention attachment styles. They described avoidant people as calm and independent, but they never explained what secure attachment actually looked like.

    As I explained what I had learned, I accidentally answered a question I had been asking about him for years.

    Why wasn’t he jealous?

    For years, I thought those were two separate questions.

    They weren’t.

    They had the same answer.

    Robert wasn’t calm because he loved me less or because he wasn’t attracted to me.

    Or that he didn’t think it would be the worst thing to lose me.

    He was calm because his mind wasn’t organized around the expectation of losing me.

    His mind wasn’t set at a negative outcome default.

    That realization changed everything.

    The very thing that convinced Robert he was avoidant was actually evidence of his secure attachment.

    And the very thing I interpreted as a lack of passion was, in many ways, evidence of the same thing.

    He isn’t what people expect.

    A few nights ago, Robert and I were sitting at a bar when something happened that made me laugh.

    A man Robert had greeted earlier noticed him walk away to pay our tab. He came over and asked, “Are you Robert’s wife?”

    When I said yes, he smiled.

    “When Robert turns around, I want you to hug me. Let’s see his face.”

    I laughed.

    “I’ll hug you,” I said, “but you’re not going to get the reaction you’re hoping for.”

    He looked confused.

    “Really?”

    “No,” I said. “First, Robert is going to know it’s a joke because I don’t hug random people. And second, he’s probably just going to roll his eyes because that’s simply not who he is.”

    The man couldn’t believe it.

    When Robert came back, I told him what had happened, and we all laughed.

    Driving home, I realized something.

    For years, I thought I was the only one trying to explain Robert.

    I wasn’t.

    My friends had explanations.

    My family had explanations.

    Strangers had explanations.

    I had explanations.

    Everyone was observing the same man.

    Everyone was assigning a different meaning to his behavior.

    Attachment theory didn’t change Robert.

    It changed the story I believed about him.

    While his behavior remains the same.

    My perspective and interpretation of it have definitely changed.

  • The Story I Told Myself

    Today, it’s 11:05 a.m., and the sun is still hiding behind the clouds, casting an overcast scene in front of me. The air is humid, wrapping around me like a blanket. I don’t mind humidity, though. I’ve visited desert regions of the United States, and I’ve come to appreciate what I call nature’s moisturizer. Humidity leaves our skin soft and shiny instead of rough and dull.

    I’ve been excited to write about what I learned over the weekend because I seem to process things best when I’m forced to articulate them. Writing in my journal, to people, or on this blog helps me clarify where I stand and, ultimately, find peace.

    This weekend, I read a book that I think everyone should read—especially if you are married, have children, are a teenager beginning to date, or are a teacher working with children from a variety of households.

    I’m sitting here listening to the birds chirp, trying to figure out where to start because the book offers so much insight. I expected to learn about relationships. Instead, I learned something about myself.

    A few days ago, I was outside working in the yard while listening to the audiobook. Before long, I found myself walking inside to find Robert.

    “You make sense now,” I told him.

    Then I laughed.

    “Actually, I make sense now, too.”

    Before reading the book, Robert thought he was avoidant. I didn’t know what I was—maybe just a basket case. If you know me, you know you laughed.

    It turns out everything I assumed I knew about myself, my marriage, and my relationships with others was mostly wrong—in a good way. Attachment theory ended up explaining things about our marriage that had puzzled me for years.

    If you have read the book Attached, you know where this is going. If you haven’t, I highly recommend it. I had no expectations when I purchased it. I enjoy scientific studies on human behavior, but I wasn’t prepared to be confronted with the possibility that I had misunderstood something fundamental about my own marriage.

    I think sometimes we carry on like slightly ill people who never go to the doctor, so we never realize that headaches at 3:00 every day aren’t normal. Then one day we go in for something completely unrelated, and the doctor says, “Hey, you don’t happen to get headaches every afternoon, do you?”

    As it turns out, there’s a reason.

    Suddenly, something you’ve experienced for years makes sense.

    That’s how this book felt.

    For years, a certain symptom kept showing up in my relationship with Robert.

    When we were dating, friends would tell me to break up with him.

    “He doesn’t prioritize you,” they would say.

    But that explanation never quite fit the man I knew.

    He was kind.

    Yes, he liked spending time with his friends. Sometimes he chose them over me. But even when I was disappointed, it never outweighed the character, gentleness, and steadiness I saw in him.

    He wasn’t constantly whispering sweet words in my ear.

    He wasn’t overly emotional.

    He wasn’t intense.

    But somehow, it still felt right.

    Then we got married.

    We had children.

    Time alone together became harder to find.

    And suddenly, some of those things that hadn’t bothered me before became harder to ignore.

    My friends were married now, too.

    Some had husbands who became jealous over interactions with other men. Some would confront perceived threats. Some seemed intensely protective.

    But not Robert.

    In fact, when I was in college (and married), I had a close male friend. Our friendship was completely platonic. We had some of the same classes, studied together, grabbed lunch occasionally, and sometimes he even came to both Robert and me for advice about his relationship.

    Robert never seemed threatened.

    Never seemed jealous.

    Never seemed concerned.

    And it wasn’t just him.

    As the years passed, I wondered. Then, I began filling in the blanks.

    Maybe he wasn’t worried because he wasn’t attracted to me.

    Maybe he wasn’t worried because he didn’t see me the way other husbands seemed to see their wives.

    Maybe he loved me, but not with the intensity I saw in other relationships.

    The strange thing was that those explanations never quite fit the evidence. Overall, I was often just as happy—or happier—in my marriage as friends whose husbands were intensely jealous or protective.

    So how can I make this make sense?

    I’ve always been perceptive.

    One time, Robert wanted to move a family friend into our home. The moment I met him, alarms went off in my head. I told Robert absolutely not. Later we learned that the man had been scamming a family member out of thousands of dollars.

    Another time, I got off a brief phone call and immediately told Robert that I thought a family member knew something we had intentionally kept from them.

    “No way,” Robert said.

    But they did.

    So I began to trust my instincts.

    Actually, that’s not quite right.

    I began to trust my interpretations.

    That sentence changed the way I think about nearly every relationship in my life.

    I thought I had become an expert relationship meaning-maker.

    If I sensed something, I assumed I understood it.

    If I noticed a shift, I assumed I knew why.

    What I would eventually learn is that observation and interpretation are not the same thing.

    According to attachment theory, there are three main attachment styles, but two of them immediately caught my attention.

    The securely attached person generally assumes the relationship is okay unless given a reason to think otherwise. They are open to love, receive love easily, and tend to believe the relationship will persevere.

    The anxiously attached person also builds deep connections. But when they sense a change in that connection, they don’t always interpret it as neutral.

    Research discussed in the book found that anxiously attached individuals are often remarkably perceptive. They notice subtle changes in emotional connection faster than many other people.

    The problem isn’t necessarily what they notice.

    The problem is what happens next.

    An anxious attachment style doesn’t just notice the shift.

    It assigns meaning to the shift.

    A delayed text becomes rejection.

    A quiet evening becomes distance.

    A distracted spouse becomes a spouse who has lost interest.

    The observation may be accurate.

    The interpretation may not be.

    That distinction hit me like a ton of bricks.

    For years, I thought my intuition was infallible because I had been right enough times to trust my conclusions.

    What I failed to realize was that being a good observer and being a good interpreter are not the same thing.

    Attachment theory didn’t teach me to distrust my intuition.

    It taught me to slow it down,

    Looking back, I can see how often I confused observation with certainty. I noticed shifts and immediately assigned meaning to them. I filled in blanks. I connected dots. And because I had been right before, I trusted my conclusions without always questioning them.

    What I didn’t know then was that one of the biggest misconceptions in my marriage wasn’t about Robert at all.

    It was about the story I had created to explain him.

    And that’s where attachment theory changed everything.

  • Did It Matter?

    Every morning, I drop the kids off at school, and occasionally, right as I’m driving off, I start thinking, what if that was it? What if this morning was our last?

    Then I wonder: if I were the survivor, would I be able to carry grief without regret? How did our last morning go? Was I gentle enough? Did I kiss them enough times? Did I play with them enough? Did we snuggle on the couch? Lord knows I’ve been too busy to read with them lately.

    This doesn’t cross my mind often, but when it does, the questions sometimes haunt me.

    Then the moment becomes a declaration of change.

    I will read to them tonight.

    I will kiss them when they get home.

    I will do every single thing I just listed because, if I end up with a second chance, I am going to make it worth it.

    But then sports happen. Dinner time happens. Atlas testing happens. Keeping my children awake for a book seems less important in the moment since they need rest, and then I find myself, more often than not, right back in the same pattern I was in before I had those intrusive thoughts.

    Yes, sometimes we pick up something new that sticks, but I often find myself living on the margins of motherhood and marriage. The paper is already full, and anything more might push me completely off the page.

    If I add something to motherhood, I may have to erase something from my marriage. If I add something to my marriage, it may take up lines that were being used somewhere else. Every date night, every extra book, every new commitment has to fit onto a page that already feels crowded.

    It’s where the echoes of a fleeting life battle with the realities of a sustainable one.

    “They grow up too fast.”

    “Just read it one more time.”

    “Life is short.”

    The voices urging us to do more are not wrong. They are often rooted in love. But they rarely acknowledge that the page is already full.

    Truth is, deep down, we all know that doing more does not lead to completion. It can lead to temporary comfort, but not complete comfort, especially with social media’s portrayal of what an ideal marriage or parenthood should be.

    The more I think about the most important roles in life, the more I realize they don’t come to an end.

    They are the most important because they matter.

    And for things that continue to matter, there is no certificate of completion.

    I think that’s the conundrum.

    The problem isn’t that we can’t improve. It’s that even when we do, we don’t get a final verdict.

    The landscape evolves.

    So maybe the answer isn’t an answer at all.

    Maybe it’s changing the question from “Did I do it all?” to “Did it matter to me?”

    Because “Did I do it all?” is unwinnable.

    But “Did it matter to me?”

    What is the evidence of that?

    I didn’t read a book every night, but I read books to them.

    I didn’t snuggle every minute, but I snuggled with them.

    I wasn’t perfect, but I showed up.

    Not because the work is complete.

    Not because I got everything right.

    But because when I look back, I can honestly say these people mattered to me.

    And maybe the goal was never to live every day like it was the last.

    Maybe the goal was simply to live life like it mattered.

  • When Perfection Becomes Shame

    Recently, I shared how I discovered that many of my relationship patterns were rooted in a fear of abandonment. What looked like contradictory behaviors—clinging too tightly in some relationships and wanting to run from others—turned out to be different responses to the same fear.

    If you haven’t read that story yet, you can find it here:

    Different Birds From the Same Nest

    That discovery gave me something I had never had before.

    A map.

    For years, I spent my energy trying to change behaviors without understanding where they came from. Once I understood the root, everything started making more sense.

    A few weeks later, Robert unexpectedly asked me a question that made me wonder if the same process might apply to him.

    We have a major backyard renovation underway right now. Contractors, concrete, pool liners, schedules, budgets—the whole thing.

    If you’ve ever met my husband, you already know this is exactly the kind of project that activates every anxiety circuit he has.

    One day he asked me:

    “Do you think some people are just more bothered by imperfection than others?”

    I told him yes.

    Then he asked:

    “Do you think it’s okay that things bother me when they aren’t perfect?”

    I told him that I thought it depended on how much it affected his life.

    If noticing imperfections helps you catch problems before they become disasters, that’s a gift.

    If it keeps you from enjoying your life, that’s a different conversation.

    Then I told him about my own discovery.

    For years, I thought my tendency to emotionally check out, pull away, or occasionally feel like running from my marriage had something to do with what my marriage lacked.

    I thought maybe I needed more reassurance.

    More connection.

    More attention.

    But after years of counseling, reading, and self-reflection, I discovered something uncomfortable.

    The fear wasn’t really about Robert.

    It was older than Robert.

    When I finally understood my fear of abandonment, so many things started making sense.

    So I told him something simple.

    “I don’t think I can tell you why you’re a perfectionist. But I wonder if there’s a reason.”

    Because once you discover that your own behaviors have roots, you start looking at struggles differently.

    Instead of being judgmental, you start wondering why.

    The truth is, I don’t think Robert’s standards are the problem.

    Some of the things I admire most about him come from those standards.

    This is a man who was captain of the football team.

    Captain of the soccer team, despite not even liking soccer.

    A 4.0 engineering student.

    An engineer.

    A leader.

    A problem solver.

    A person who has spent most of his life setting goals and reaching them.

    High standards have served him well.

    But as we talked, I realized something.

    I don’t think perfection becomes a problem when it pushes us to do our best.

    I think perfection becomes a problem when it keeps us from taking the next step because we haven’t already reached the finish line.

    I told Robert that I know he values his faith.

    How do I know?

    Because I’ve watched him live it.

    I’ve seen him read his Bible.

    I’ve seen him turn to Scripture for comfort.

    I’ve watched him cling to God during seasons when life felt impossible.

    I’ve found Bible verses scribbled on pieces of paper.

    I’ve watched him seek God when nobody else was looking.

    So when he tells me he doesn’t like where his spiritual life is, I believe him.

    But I also told him something I’ve noticed.

    Sometimes when we miss church, he feels like he’s failing spiritually.

    And yet from Monday through Saturday there are dozens of opportunities to nurture that relationship.

    A devotional on the way to work.

    Five minutes in Scripture.

    A prayer during lunch.

    Listening to the Bible while driving.

    Small things.

    Micro wins.

    But it seems like sometimes those opportunities get overshadowed by the feeling that he isn’t where he wants to be.

    And then I realized I’ve done the exact same thing.

    One week we missed church.

    A few days later, I found myself emotionally depleted and desperately needing comfort.

    I knew exactly what I needed.

    I needed God.

    I needed my Bible.

    But when I reached for it, I felt resistance.

    Not because I didn’t want God.

    Because I didn’t want the guilt.

    Somehow, I had convinced myself that because I missed church on Sunday, opening my Bible on Tuesday wouldn’t matter.

    As if five minutes with God couldn’t possibly count because I had already missed the bigger goal.

    But eventually I had to remind myself that I don’t think God only wants to hear from us on mountaintops.

    I think He wants to hear from us in valleys too.

    Maybe especially in valleys.

    So I opened my Bible anyway.

    And I found exactly what I needed.

    Not condemnation.

    Comfort.

    That’s when I realized that shame has a way of moving into spaces where growth was supposed to live.

    And the more I thought about it, the more I realized I see this pattern in other areas of Robert’s life too.

    Sometimes with finances.

    Sometimes with projects.

    Sometimes with goals.

    Sometimes with risks.

    If he thinks something might fail, he often doesn’t want to start.

    He’ll even tell me that I push him toward things he doesn’t feel qualified to do.

    Yet many of the things he says he isn’t qualified for are things I genuinely believe he could accomplish.

    That’s what made me wonder if perfectionism isn’t really the issue.

    Maybe the issue is a fear of failure mixed with a very high standard of achievement.

    And that combination can be dangerous.

    Because it can create anxiety.

    It can create avoidance.

    It can even create complacency.

    Not because you don’t care.

    But because you care so much that failing feels unbearable.

    The more we talked, the more I realized this wasn’t really about church.

    Or finances.

    Or projects.

    Those were just examples.

    The deeper question was this:

    Why does the standard matter so much?

    Who are you trying to impress?

    And does that audience even exist anymore?

    That’s when I told Robert something I’ve wanted him to understand for years.

    I reminded him of something I told him when I was struggling with postpartum depression.

    I asked him if he remembered me telling him that sometimes the simple sound of him walking through the door made me feel better.

    He said yes.

    I told him that’s still true.

    That’s all I’ve ever really needed from him.

    His presence.

    His heart.

    His willingness to show up.

    Emotionally.

    Physically.

    Consistently.

    He’s already won my approval.

    The kids feel the same way.

    For years I’ve watched them run to the door yelling:

    “Daddy! Daddy!”

    They weren’t running because he had a perfect GPA.

    They weren’t running because he was captain of anything.

    They weren’t running because of a promotion, a savings account, or a completed project.

    They were running because he was their dad.

    Which made me wonder if the measuring stick he’s using belongs to the people sitting around his table.

    Because I don’t think he’s achieving for me.

    And I don’t think he’s achieving for our children.

    So maybe the better question isn’t whether the standard is too high.

    Maybe the better question is:

    Who set the standard?

    And does it still serve the life you’re trying to build today?

    Because sometimes the very thing that helped us succeed becomes the thing that keeps us from enjoying the success we’ve already achieved.

    Understanding the root changed my life.

    Not because it excused my behavior.

    But because it gave me a map.

    And maybe that’s where growth starts.

    Not by judging the behavior.

    But by becoming curious about the story behind it.

    So I told Robert that I think instead of worrying about whether his perfectionism is okay, I would be more interested in understanding where it comes from.

    I was actually hesitant to offer too many answers because I think some discoveries are more meaningful when we make them ourselves.

    Books helped me.

    Counseling helped me.

    Self-reflection helped me.

    But nobody could simply hand me the answer.

    I had to discover it.

    So my best advice to him was simple.

    I think somewhere along the way achievement became associated with something important.

    Maybe it was approval.

    Maybe it was security.

    Maybe it was identity.

    Maybe it was proving something.

    Maybe it was all of those things.

    I don’t know.

    But I suspect there was a reason that achievement became so valuable.

    The question isn’t whether that reason was right or wrong.

    The question is whether it still matters.

    Because what I learned through my own journey is that sometimes we keep carrying lessons long after we’ve outgrown the circumstances that created them.

    For years, I lived as though abandonment carried the same threat it did when I was a child.

    It didn’t.

    The fear was real.

    The lesson was outdated.

    Maybe achievement works the same way.

    Maybe the meaning it once held isn’t the meaning it holds today.

    Maybe the standard that once helped build a life becomes the standard that keeps us from enjoying it.

    And maybe growth isn’t always about becoming someone new.

    Maybe sometimes it’s about examining the beliefs we’ve carried for years and deciding whether they still belong in the life we’re living now.

    Because once I understood where my fear came from, it lost some of its power over me.

    And I wonder if the same thing might happen when we understand why we feel such a strong need to achieve.

    Not because achievement is bad.

    But because understanding the root gives us a choice.

    And choice is where freedom begins.

  • Different Birds From the Same Nest

    For years, I thought I had a contradiction in my personality.

    In some relationships, I would stay far too long.

    I would overlook red flags. I would excuse behavior that hurt me. I would ignore my own needs. I would bend until I barely recognized myself. Sometimes I would even sacrifice my own self-respect trying to preserve a relationship that wasn’t healthy for me.

    All because I couldn’t tolerate the ending.

    It was that simple.

    Ending a relationship, no matter how much peace it might bring, felt like failure.

    But then there was the other side of me.

    The side that would sometimes run.

    Even in my marriage, there were moments when I felt an overwhelming urge to pull away when I felt disconnected, hurt, or emotionally unsafe.

    “I can’t stay,” I would tell myself.

    And that confused me because I love my husband.

    How could someone go to extraordinary lengths to maintain some relationships while wanting to escape others?

    How could I spend years enduring unhealthy dynamics in one area of my life and then feel tempted to walk away from another relationship without fully understanding why?

    And truthfully, the relationship I sometimes wanted to run from was the healthiest one of them all.

    Those behaviors seemed completely opposite.

    One version of me would break my own heart trying to prevent an ending.

    The other would start looking for the exit, even though truly leaving my marriage would have broken my heart too.

    For years, I thought those were two separate problems.

    Eventually, I realized they were different birds from the same nest.

    Fear of abandonment.

    That realization changed everything.

    I had spent years looking at the people involved. I analyzed their behavior, their intentions, their actions, and their impact on my life.

    What I wasn’t looking at was myself.

    Why was I reacting this way?

    Why did endings feel so unbearable?

    Why did distance feel so threatening?

    Why did I sometimes sacrifice my own peace to keep a connection alive?

    I remember one of my closest friendships ending in 2021.

    Walking away from that friendship felt devastating, but I knew I had to do it.

    Then, in 2023, my marriage was hurting deeply, and I remember feeling ready to email a divorce attorney.

    Looking back, one question stands out:

    How could ending a friendship feel harder than the possibility of ending my own marriage?

    At the time, I thought the answer was the people involved.

    I thought one relationship must have mattered more than the other.

    But that wasn’t true.

    The friendship wasn’t more important than my husband.

    If anything, I often held Robert to a higher standard because I loved him more deeply and because his opinion carried more weight than anyone else’s.

    There were even times when I would tell myself:

    “If I’m willing to tolerate this behavior from other people, then why can’t I tolerate it from Robert?”

    But that wasn’t really the issue.

    The issue wasn’t the relationship.

    The issue was the silence.

    When friendships struggled, there were usually still conversations.

    Arguments.

    Explanations.

    Attempts.

    Sometimes those conversations were painful, but they still carried something important:

    Hope.

    Words meant there was still engagement.

    Words meant there was still movement.

    Words meant there was still a chance to repair what was broken.

    With Robert, it wasn’t the conflict that made me want to give up.

    It was the silence.

    The silence felt louder than any argument.

    My friends could be talking and still not understand me.

    Meanwhile, my husband often understood me better than anyone else in the world, but when he became quiet, it felt as though he had already left emotionally.

    And because I thought the person was the answer, I completely missed what was actually happening.

    I wasn’t responding to the quality of the relationship.

    I was responding to my fear of abandonment.

    But the answer started much earlier than my friendship in 2021 or my marriage 18 years ago.

    While reading psychology books and spending years in counseling, I came across a concept that stopped me in my tracks.

    When children are forced to remain in relationships that are unhealthy, they often learn to survive by focusing on the good in the person or relationship.

    If you think about it, it makes perfect sense.

    A child can’t always leave.

    A child often can’t change the situation.

    A child is dependent on the very people who may be hurting them.

    So what is left?

    Endure.

    Adapt.

    Find the positive.

    Look for reasons to stay.

    Learn to survive the reality you have.

    You cannot safely protest a dynamic when your survival depends on maintaining it.

    So what happens?

    The unhealthy dynamic stays in place because the child has no power to change it.

    Over time, that survival strategy becomes a habit.

    Even deeper, if speaking up threatens the relationship, a child can become conditioned to believe that abandonment threatens safety itself.

    The lesson becomes simple:

    If people leave, I’m not safe.

    Children become very good at making associations.

    A bell rings.

    The cheese appears.

    Eventually the bell means cheese.

    In much the same way, children learn emotional associations.

    Confrontation means abandonment.

    Abandonment means danger.

    And even when you become an adult and logically know your safety no longer depends on another person, those old associations can still become your default settings.

    When I read that, I immediately grabbed a pen and paper.

    Because suddenly my behavior made sense.

    I wasn’t overlooking red flags because I couldn’t see them.

    I was overlooking them because I had spent years practicing endurance.

    I had learned to find the good.

    I had learned to understand.

    I had learned to empathize.

    I had learned to forgive.

    What I had not learned was that sometimes the healthiest response is to leave.

    But that still didn’t explain why I sometimes wanted to run.

    Then another piece fell into place.

    The answer was hidden in what abandonment looked like to me.

    Growing up, silence was rarely neutral.

    Silence meant something was wrong.

    Silence was often followed by withdrawal.

    Silence was what happened when a relationship was breaking down.

    In my experience, silence meant someone had stopped fighting for the relationship.

    Silence meant I didn’t matter.

    So when I got married, I brought that understanding with me.

    The problem was that Robert brought a completely different understanding.

    In my family, conflict was loud.

    People argued.

    People cried.

    People fought things out.

    It wasn’t always healthy, but one thing was certain:

    Engagement meant the relationship was still alive.

    Silence was what happened when people gave up.

    In Robert’s family, it was almost the opposite.

    Silence wasn’t surrender.

    Silence wasn’t abandonment.

    Silence was a way to prevent escalation.

    Silence was a way to calm down.

    Silence was a way to avoid saying things you couldn’t take back.

    To them, creating space was often the healthier choice.

    To me, it felt terrifying.

    Of course, neither system was perfect.

    My family’s version of conflict often escalated too quickly. Sometimes emotions drove the conversation more than wisdom.

    But the strength of that system was that problems were usually out in the open.

    People knew where they stood.

    Robert’s family had a different strength.

    They were less likely to escalate. More measured. More restrained.

    But every strength has a shadow side.

    The risk wasn’t yelling.

    The risk was that silence could become permanent.

    The risk was that problems could remain unresolved because no one wanted to make anyone uncomfortable enough to address them.

    One family risked too much confrontation.

    The other risked too little.

    One feared escalation.

    The other feared disconnection.

    And somewhere in the middle is probably where healthy conflict lives.

    What looked like safety to Robert looked like abandonment to me.

    What looked like connection to me sometimes felt like escalation to him.

    Neither of us arrived at those conclusions by accident.

    We learned them.

    We learned them in the homes that raised us.

    So when conflict entered our marriage, we weren’t just dealing with each other.

    We were dealing with years of conditioning that told us what conflict meant.

    When Robert became quiet, my nervous system wasn’t hearing:

    “I need a little time.”

    It was hearing:

    “You don’t matter.”

    And when I pushed harder for connection, reassurance, or repair, Robert wasn’t necessarily hearing:

    “I love you and I’m scared.”

    Sometimes he was hearing escalation.

    Two people.

    Two coping mechanisms.

    Two definitions of safety.

    And both of them made perfect sense in the environments where they were formed.

    That’s when I realized something important.

    The same fear that made me cling could also make me run.

    Because if abandonment is the thing you fear most, there are two ways to protect yourself.

    You can hold on too tightly.

    Or you can leave before someone else has the chance to.

    Different strategies.

    Same fear.

    Different birds.

    Same nest.

    That single realization solved a lot of problems in my life.

    It also gave me a map.

    Understanding that changed everything.

    It helped me see that I wasn’t reacting to the present moment as much as I was reacting to old fears.

    It helped me recognize that engagement does not always mean a relationship is healthy.

    And silence does not always mean a relationship is over.

    Especially in my marriage.

    Most importantly, it helped me understand something I wish I had learned much earlier:

    Some relationships are worth saving.

    Some are not.

    And I am no longer responsible for maintaining relationships that hurt me.

    The child version of me didn’t have a choice.

    The adult version of me does.

    Today, I still deeply value relationships.

    I still believe in forgiveness.

    I still believe in empathy.

    But I no longer believe that every relationship must be preserved at any cost.

    Sometimes walking away is wisdom.

    Sometimes distance is healthy.

    And sometimes what feels like abandonment isn’t abandonment at all.

    Maybe it’s freedom.

  • When Christmas Is Split in Two

    When Christmas Is Split in Two


    Protecting the Heart of a Child During the Holidays

    This morning I looked at my youngest son.

    He is adopted, and he knows he has another mommy out there somewhere. He doesn’t know the complex parts yet. He doesn’t understand how he didn’t start out as mine—how we used to meet his mom for the holidays at the DHS office, or how, when we pulled into that parking lot, he would kick his feet with excitement to see her. The first time he did that he was about a year old. I remember being floored. He couldn’t talk yet, but he knew. Honestly, that’s when I knew I couldn’t ever be dishonest about adoption.

    He was innately hers from the start. And truthfully, I know he always will be in some way.

    During those days, I stayed quiet. I couldn’t tell which way our case would go, and I so desperately wanted to be part of Kaleb’s life if he went home with her. Even on the days I wished she would be healed, try harder—or even step away so we wouldn’t be left in limbo—I chose silence.

    Now, years past that chapter of his life, I remind Kaleb only of how much his mom loved him—and how much I loved her too. I didn’t love every choice she made, but the one that mattered most to me was the day she chose to bring my son into this world, knowing full well she would struggle to care for him.

    That is what I tell Kaleb about her.

    Because I remember Christmas when I was little.

    When you are a child of divorced or absent parents, the holidays can be especially hard.

    Even as a grown adult and a court reporter, the most difficult part of domestic relations cases was always the Judge’s ruling—because from that moment forward, a child would no longer wake up to both mom and dad. And we were the ones making that final, in court.

    Maybe it’s a childhood wound of mine, but I carry deep empathy for the children—and parents—who navigate this season every year. Only one parent gets the glimpses of Christmas morning: the jaw-dropping expressions when a child sees a half-empty glass of milk, cookies gone, and carrots vanished.

    Yes, this is survivable.
    But as a biological child, stepchild, foster mom, and adoptive parent, I can tell you this plainly:

    One of the fastest ways to damage a child’s holiday is to make the custody agreement about yourself.

    When you are the primary parent, you carry an immense load. But unless you have been the child at the center of a custody agreement, it is impossible to fully understand the pain a child carries when a parent is absent during the holidays.

    I don’t believe two people who cannot be together should stay together “for the kids.” That doesn’t create a happy childhood either. But I do believe the sacrifices you make for your children should be silent ones.

    It’s tempting to explain all the ways the other parent has failed—and all the ways you’ve stepped in to fill the gap. But think back to high school, when someone you cared about walked away. You probably carried the blame, even if it had nothing to do with you.

    Children do the same thing—quietly, artlessly.

    When they hear negative talk about a parent, they don’t process it as truth about the adult. They internalize it as something lacking in themselves. Being asked to listen to slander about a biological parent is like being asked to gossip about the one person they feel an uncontrollable devotion and loyalty toward.

    I would argue that sometimes this devotion runs even deeper than parent-to-child. Adults have ways to justify betrayal. Children don’t. For them, loyalty is black and white.

    What’s worse is that many children won’t stop you—or tell you how much it hurts—because the same loyalty they feel toward the absent parent, they feel toward you too.

    So if you’re carrying the load this Christmas—buying the presents, filling the stockings hung by the chimney, setting out cookies for Santa—you are pouring love on behalf of two parents. That matters. And I see you.

    But don’t try to collect recognition early by reminding a child of all the ways their biological parent didn’t show up.

    I’ve had foster children whose parents hadn’t shown up in years, and they were still waiting, still hoping, still loving them. A child’s love for neglectful—or even abusive—parents mirrors the story of the prodigal son: unfathomable forgiveness, longing, and purity of heart (Luke 15:11–32).

    If you ever wonder whether the world sees you, know this: we do. Most people don’t say anything because the world is trained to speak more on injustice than on awe.

    But the mark you’re imprinting doesn’t show up right away.
    It shows up in adulthood.

    Children grow up and they remember who didn’t unload the burden of an absent parent onto them. Who carried the weight quietly. Who loved in the shadows without needing to be seen.

    And when they realize that, they show up at your door for the holidays—not out of obligation, but because they want to.

    Because when there was an empty, aching space in their heart, you didn’t shine a spotlight on it. Your quiet integrity rested like a gentle hand on the wound—steady and protective—holding the pain long enough for healing to begin.

  • A Thousand Years: Pregnancy Loss by Felecia Jacks

    A Thousand Years: Pregnancy Loss by Felecia Jacks

    New Post: A Thousand Years: Pregnancy Loss By Felecia Jacks
    June 16, 2025 | Interpersonal Insight

    At the James Arthur concert, I was caught off guard when he sang “A Thousand Years.” Two weeks earlier, I had shared the story behind that song with Abigail—our pregnancy loss in 2010. When we got home that night, she played it on repeat through her Alexa.

    I don’t have the words to express what it feels like when you realize your daughter understands the depth of love, pain, and hope that stories like these bring to life.

    “Mom, why does it mean so much to you?”

    That question lingered—echoing the unspoken pain and deep emotion I carry.


    The Heart of Loss

    In June 2010, my husband and I faced a heartbreaking reality: we lost our first child. My heart shattered when the doctor told me I wouldn’t be meeting the little one who had already stolen mine.

    I tried to understand—did I cause this? Was it something I did? But there isn’t always an explanation. And that might be the most brutal truth of all.

    A person you loved had to go, and there was nothing you could do to stop it. No lesson to learn. No habit to fix. Just grief.

    Grief that leaves a hole in the soul.

    What Does Grief Look Like?

    It looks like a new reason to look forward to heaven.

    It’s marked by two dates—one for the due date, and one for the day they were lost.

    You count each year how old they would’ve been.

    Even without holding them, there are vivid images—face, hair color, personality. They grow in your heart, not in front of your eyes.

    You celebrate silent birthdays. You remember them in private. You feel them in sacred moments.

    Over time, anger softens. The pain doesn’t go away, but it transforms. You don’t get over it—you grow around it.

    Until one day, a “birthday” arrives, and the dam breaks again. The memories flood in: the image of their eyes, the way they’d fit into your family, the life that might have been. You smile. You cry. You know they would’ve belonged.


    A Sacred Space in Your Heart

    In quiet moments, if you close your eyes, you see something holy—
    eyes that never opened, dreams that never unfolded, love that never faded.

    They live deep in your soul, and in that hope—something only God gives to parents of children in heaven—you find peace.

    You know they’re waiting.

    And that knowing becomes something you feel in your skin.


    The Story of Love and Hope

    When that song played, everything came rushing back.

    Why does it mean so much?

    Because it’s more than a melody. It’s a story.

    Your dad was surprised by that pregnancy. We had only been married two months. He wanted me to finish school. He wanted peace. I wanted hope.

    Each month, I prayed silently for a surprise.

    Handwritten prayer journal page dated April 3, 2012, expressing gratitude and hope after discovering a pregnancy
    A heartfelt prayer written the day I found out I was pregnant with Matthew

    The Moment of Hope

    In January 2012, I dared to hope again. I calculated: if we conceived in March, I could finish school by December.

    He felt the ache I carried. He said yes.

    And in April, the test turned positive. I ran to my journal. He came home to a gray shirt with a very obvious message.


    A Prayer from the Heart

    “Dear God,

    I come to you today because I just found out I am pregnant, and just like I come to you when I’m sad or scared, I come to say thank you.

    Thank you for Robert. Thank you for this child.

    After those cramps Sunday, I knew that was you at work. Thank you. I can’t explain it, but I know you’re near.”


    Life’s Unexpected Trials

    But life had other plans.

    In May, I saw blood. At the OB’s office, I learned I had a subchorionic hemorrhage. A 50/50 chance of survival. I was crushed.

    In the shower, blood washing down the drain, I dropped to my knees and prayed. That prayer became a life-marking moment.

    I sang “A Thousand Years.” I waited. I braced.


    The Miracle of Matthew

    Matthew Bryan Jacks was born in December 2012—almost exactly a thousand days after we lost the first baby.

    When I held him, he was so still I thought he had died in my arms. I screamed.

    But then he moved.

    And I knew—God answered.


    The Meaning of Love and the Song

    I hear the lyrics differently now:

    Heart beats fast, colours and promises. How to be brave?

    How can I love when I’m afraid to fall?

    I have died every night waiting for you…

    And I would love you for a thousand more.


    Final Reflection

    That day in the car, when Abigail asked, “Mom, why does it mean so much to you?”—I didn’t have the perfect answer.

    But in my heart, I knew she understood the story.

    Not just the one I told her—but the one written into the song.

    This wasn’t just about music. It was about a love that endured. A faith that healed. A loss that shaped forever.

    Because even love that only lives for a moment can shape eternity.

    And the truest love really can wait a thousand years.